SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 784

P.S.NARAYANA
Eppala China Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
Secretary to Government, Social Welfare (F) Department, Government of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare and also the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj.

2. This matter was adjourned to this day, since the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj requested time to get instructions relating to the position of the gram panchayats in question, till the prior elections.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj had stated before this Court that in the prior elections, the general Rules relating to the reservations alone were made applicable and in view of the fact that the District Collector had issued a clarification, which is placed before this Court at present, since these are scheduled areas, all these offices are reserved to the Scheduled Tribe. The proceedings are also placed before this Court.

4. Sri Y.S. Sai Vara Prasad, learned counsel representing the petitioners would submit that the Gram Panchayats in question are not in scheduled area and in fact, in a slightly different context, several persons relating to these areas approached this Court by way of W.P.No.1413 of 1973 with respect of 14 villages, out of 23 villages of the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top