SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 633

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Arthamudi Ramu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India rep. by the General Manager, South Central Railway, Secunderabad – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, assailing the order, dated 17-10-2005, in OAA.No.229 of 1999 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench. It raises an important question of law viz., whether the proceedings instituted before the Tribunal by an individual, claiming damages for the injuries received by him in an untoward incident or accident, would survive his death during the pendency of the proceedings.

2. The deceased-first appellant submitted a claim before the Tribunal, stating that he was travelling from Rajahmundry to Nidadavolu on 22-03-1999, in Train No. 8561, Link Express, and when the Train was about to stop at Nidadavolu Station, the passengers, who stood behind, pushed him, resulting in his fall between the moving train and platform No.2. It was pleaded that as a result of the fall, his left leg was run over and was later on, amputated. A sum of Rs.4,00,000/- was claimed as compensation.

3. The respondents resisted the claim and stated that no untoward incident, as such, has taken place at Nidadavolu Station on 22-03-1999. It was contended that the first appellant was not a bona fide passenger and even if he h













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top