SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 94

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
A. Peddanna – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Security Commissioner, R. P. F. , Guntakal, Anantapur District – Respondent


ORDER

The petitioner is working as Head Constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF), in the Guntakal Division. He filed this writ petition for issuance of Writ of Mandamus declaring the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against him, vide Memo dated 21-09-2005, issued by the respondent herein, as arbitrary and illegal.

The facts that gave raise to the filing of this writ petition, are as under:

The Station House Officer, Narpala police station of Anantapur District, registered Crime No.44 of 2001 against the petitioner alleging that he has abused the Daliths, named in the First Information Report, with reference to their caste, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the Act"). The same has been taken up as P.R.C. No. 154 of 2001 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Anantapur.

2. Alleging that the petitioner did not attend the Court on the due date, the trial Court is said to have issued a non-bailable warrant against the petitioner on 21-01-2005. The Station House Officer addressed a letter, narrating the said facts, to the respon



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top