SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 681

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Neetha Chintawar – Appellant
Versus
Bodugam Gopi – Respondent


ORDER

Plaintiff in O.S.No.189 of 2005 on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Adilabad, filed this revision. They filed the suit for the relief of perpetual injunction, against the respondent herein, in respect of the suit schedule property. I.A.No.368 of 2005 was filed under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 C.P.C., for grant of temporary injunction. After issuing notice to the respondent, the trial Court granted temporary injunction in favour of the petitioners on 08-08-2005.

2. The petitioners filed I.A.No.413 of 2005 under Section 151 C.P.C. with a prayer to grant police protection, for implementation of the order of temporary injunction. The respondent opposed the application, alleging that there is some dispute as to the boundaries, It was also alleged that the petitioners are trying to grab the land of the respondent, under the guise of the order of temporary injunction. Through its order, dated 31-08-2005, the trial Court dismissed the LA. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition.

3. Sri Pratap Narayan Sanghi, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the view taken by the trial Court while dismissing the LA., cannot be sustained in law. He contends that the trial Court expr








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top