SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 604

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
T. Arthi – Appellant
Versus
K. Anand Reddy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Plaintiff in O.S.No.37 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Puttur, filed this revision. She feels aggrieved by the order dated 31-03-2006 passed by the trial Court, overruling her objection as to the admissibility of an unregistered relinquishment deed.

2. The petitioner filed the suit against the respondents herein for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The relation of the parties to the suit was not disputed. However, the respondents pleaded that the petitioner executed a relinquishment deed dated 25-05-1994, giving up her right in two items, viz., land in Sy.Nos.127/1 A and 128, after receiving a sum of Rs.50,000/-. They urged that the petitioner is not entitled for any share in the said items of property.

3. The trial Court framed necessary issues, and the trial of the suit commenced. The evidence on behalf of the petitioner was closed. During the course of evidence, on behalf of the respondents herein, the document dated 25-05-1994 was sought to be relied upon. The petitioner raised an objection as to its admissibility on the ground that it is not registered. The respondents raised a twofold plea. According to them,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top