SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 637

G.ROHINI
Jampana Rajya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Pattapu Seenaiah – Respondent


ORDER

This revision petition is directed against the order dated 20-12-2002 in E.P.No.60 of 2002 in O.S.No.277 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.

2. The facts, in brief, are as under:

The first respondent herein filed O.S.No.277 of 1997 for recovery of money and the same was decreed on 24-04-2000. Even during the pendency of the suit, an order of attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 C.P.C. was in operation against the schedule property. After the suit was decreed, the plaintiff/decree holder/first respondent herein filed E.P.No.60 of 2002 for sale of the attached property. The revision petitioner/first judgment debtor opposed the execution proceedings contending that pending the suit, she filed I.P.No.49 of 1998 under Section 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (for short the Act) to adjudicate her as insolvent and the same was allowed, by virtue of which all the properties of the revision petitioner/first judgment debtor including the house property which was attached under Order XXXVIII If Rule 5 C.P.C., pending the suit vested with v the official receiver and therefore, the only If remedy available to the decree holder was to rec














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top