G.ROHINI
Jampana Rajya Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Pattapu Seenaiah – Respondent
This revision petition is directed against the order dated 20-12-2002 in E.P.No.60 of 2002 in O.S.No.277 of 1997 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole.
2. The facts, in brief, are as under:
The first respondent herein filed O.S.No.277 of 1997 for recovery of money and the same was decreed on 24-04-2000. Even during the pendency of the suit, an order of attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII Rule 5 C.P.C. was in operation against the schedule property. After the suit was decreed, the plaintiff/decree holder/first respondent herein filed E.P.No.60 of 2002 for sale of the attached property. The revision petitioner/first judgment debtor opposed the execution proceedings contending that pending the suit, she filed I.P.No.49 of 1998 under Section 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (for short the Act) to adjudicate her as insolvent and the same was allowed, by virtue of which all the properties of the revision petitioner/first judgment debtor including the house property which was attached under Order XXXVIII If Rule 5 C.P.C., pending the suit vested with v the official receiver and therefore, the only If remedy available to the decree holder was to rec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.