These two revision petitions arise out of the related proceedings in the suit and the parties are also same. Hence, this common order. The petitioner is the plaintiff. She filed suit for injunction. In the suit being O.S. No.1455 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge (West and South), Ranga Heddy District, she also filed I.A.

No.3219 of 2004 for ad interim injunction. On 1-12-2004, the trial Court granted ex parte ad interim injunction but subsequently, by order, dated 14-12-2004, the trial Court dismissed the application vacating the ex parte order. Sometime thereafter defendants also filed application being I.A. No.685 of 2005 before trial Court under Sections 144and 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPG) seeking restoration of possession by removing illegal constructions allegedly made by the plaintiff after obtaining ad interim ex parte injunction.

The same was allowed by the trial Court on 19-10-2005. The plaintiff filed C.MA No.1 of 2005 against order of the trial Court dismissing the injunction application and C.MA No.204 of 2005 against the order of the trial Court directing the plaintiff to restore possession and remove the structures