SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 754

B.PRAKASH RAO, RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Cotton Corporation of India Limited, rep. · by its Branch Manager, Guntur – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, labour Court, Guntur – Respondent


ORDER

(Per Ramesh Ranganathan, J.)

Aggrieved by the order in W.P. Nos. 8088 of 1999 and 7722 of 1999 dated 11-07-2005 whereby the punishment awarded by the Labour Court, Guntur in I.D. No. 73 of 1988 dated 25-01-1999, was modified, the present appeals are filed by Cotton Corporation of India, the Employer. Questioning the award in I.D.No.73 of 1988, the appellant herein had filed W.P. No. 7722 of 1999, and the respondent workman had tiled W.P. No. 8088 of 1999.

2. The respondent-workman, a Cotton purchase officer, was issued a charge sheet on 28-12-1984 and the charges levelled against him therein read thus:

1. That - Shri U. Chinnappa while functioning as Cotton Purchase Officer and posted as Center In-charge at Gudhihattanur center during the cotton season 1983-84 did not work with full devotion to duty and acted in a manner prejudicial to the interests of the Corporation by not conducting/taking experimental outturns as per the guidelines issued, and he has based his purchases with unrealistic outturns resulting in wide difference between budgeted and actual paid hard by Rs.243/- per candy.

ii. That Shri U. Chinnappa while functioning as Cotton Purchase Officer and posted as Center












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top