SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 705

V.ESWARAIAH
Regulavalasa Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
Munagavalasa Kanakaratnam – Respondent


ORDER

Petitioner is a tenant and the respondent is the landlady of the premises in question bearing Dr.No.11-217 with electricity service connection No.370, which is fully described in the petition schedule situated at Palakonda (Village and Mandal) of Srikakulam District.

2. The parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed in the eviction petition in R.C.C.No.1 of 1993 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-Junior Civil Judge, Rajam.

3. The landlady filed the eviction petition under Section 10(2)(i) of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act (for short the Act) on the ground of wilful default in payment of rents from August 1992 to June 1993. It is the case of the landlady that she is the owner and enjoyer of two roomed tiled house situated in Gedelavari Street, Ward NO.11 of Palakonda bearing Door NO.11-270 with Electric Service Connection No.370 and she has been attending the maintenance and repairs of the said house by paying the house tax, electrical consumption charges and she has been letting out the house for rent and she was in occupation and the respondent-tenant, who was residing just by the eastern side of her house, took the schedule house on



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top