This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by an Order dated 1-11-2004 made in O.S.No.641 of 1990 on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge at Vijayawada.

2. Defendants 4 and 5 (sic.6) in the suit filed by the 151 respondent are the petitioners in this revision. Respondent NO.1 laid a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale. Defendants 4 and 6 filed written statement supporting the claim of the plaintiff. After the plaintiffs evidence was closed, defendants 2, 4 (sic.3) and 5 adduced their evidence and it was also closed. Though defendants 4 and 6 supported the case of the plaintiff, after the evidence of the contesting defendants was closed, they wanted to lead their evidence. At that stage, defendant NO.1 filed a memo praying the Court to pass necessary Orders for disentitling defendants 4 and 6 to adduce evidence. It is stated by the 1st defendant that if the petitioner-defendants 4 and 6 wanted to adduce evidence, they could have adduced evidence even prior to adducing of evidence by contesting defendants. Since petitioner defendants 4 and 6 are supporting the case of the plaintiff, the