The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.231 of 2002 in the Court of IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad, against his brother, the petitioner herein, and their mother, the 2nd respondent, for the relief of partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The trial of the suit commenced. The 1st respondent filed an affidavit, in lieu of chief-examination as P.W.1, and filed Exs.A-1 to A-19 as documents. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed to record his cross-examination. On behalf of the 1st respondent herein, it was urged that a compromise had emerged between the parties and the cross-examination of P.W.1 must be restricted only to the contents and outcome of such compromise, and not to other aspects. The petitioner objected to the same. The trial Court overruled the objection and accepted the contention of the 1st respondent herein, through its order dated 09-01-2006. C.R.P.No.1227 of 2006 is filed against the said order.

2. The 1st respondent has also filed I.A. No.490 of 2005 under Order 12 Rule 3-A C.P.C., with a prayer to record the admission of the petitioner and the 2nd respondent herein, about the documents said to have