SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 690

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
National Insurance Company Limited through its Branch Manager, Adilabad – Appellant
Versus
Pittala Ramulu – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Respondents 1 and 2 filed O.P.No.59 of 2004 before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal - cum - II Additional District Judge. Karimnagar, claiming compensation for the death of their child in an accident involving an auto bearing No.AP 1 T 4266. The vehicle was owned by the third respondent and insured with the appellant herein. It was pleaded that when the second respondent was travelling on 02-09-2001 in the said auto from Chelgal to Venkatapoor, it met with an accident at Medipally and the infant, by name P. Venkatesh aged about one year died. It was alleged that the accident took place on account of rash and negligent driving of the vehicle.

2. The second (sic. third) respondent filed a counter-affidavit stating that he sold the vehicle to one B. Krishnam Raju, the fourth respondent herein, on 02-08-2001. Thereupon, the said Krishnam Raju was impleaded in the O.P. and he did not file any counter.

3. The O.P. was resisted by the appellant herein. It was alleged that the appellant did not receive any information about the accident and that the driver of the vehicle did not hold valid and subsisting licence. The appellant also alleged that the claim of respondents 1 and 2 is






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top