All these three writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order in view of similarity of facts and also common questions of law arising in all these writ petitions.

2. The petitioners herein aggrieved by the action of the respondents in trying to proceed with the demolition activity of the houses specified in these writ petitions had approached this court praying for positive directions.

3. In all these writ petitions notice before admission had been ordered. Statusquo for a limited period was granted and subsequent thereto the same was being extended.

4. Sri Polisetti Radha Krishna, the learned standing counsel had taken notice to file counter-affidavits in all these matters and opposed these matters.

5. Sri Nalin Kumar, Sri Giri Krishna and Sri B.Parmeshwar Rao representing Sri Ranapratap were heard on behalf of the petitioners and Sri Polisetti Radhakrishna, the learned standing counsel for the Municipality was heard on behalf of the respondents.

6. Sri Nalin Kumar, the learned counsel would maintain that the stand taken by the writ petitioners is that it is only 80 feet road, whereas the concerned municipality had taken stand that it is 100 feet road and hence rest of th