SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 270

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
K. Vinayak Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Shriram Chits Limited, Branch I, Nizamabad – Respondent


ORDER

The first respondent filed O.S.No.543 of 2002 against the petitioners and respondents 2 to 4, in the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge at Nizamabad for recovery of amount, on the strength of a chit transaction. It was pleaded that being the prized subscribers, the petitioners were paid a sum of Rs.2,04,0001,and having received the same, the petitioners failed to pay the instalments. The trial of the suit is in progress, and recording of evidence on both the sides is said to have been concluded.

2. The first respondent filed I.A.No.1205 of 2004 with a prayer to re-open the evidence, and I.A.No.1206 of 2005 under Rule 17 of Order VI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), to amend the plaint.

3. It was pleaded that soon after the petitioners emerged as prized subscribers, they instructed the first respondent to invest the amount in M/s. Shriram Investments Limited, and accordingly, investment was made in the names of the persons indicated by the petitioners herein. It was urged that the necessity to plead the facts relating to the manner of investment, was not felt when the suit was filed, and on account of very denial by the petitioners herein, as to the receipt of amount








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top