SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 820

P.S.NARAYANA
K. Manemma – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep. by its Commissioner – Respondent


ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on record.

2. The writ petition is filed for a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to receive and process the petitioners application for building permission for construction of building in Premises No.1-8-369 and 370, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad as it is not accompanied with No Objection Certificate and basing upon the entry in TSLR as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to receive and process the application for building permission without insisting No Objection Certificate and without reference to entry in TSLR and to pass such other suitable orders.

3. It is stated that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the house property bearing No.1-8-369 and 370, admeasuring 70.53 sq. metres situated at Chikkadpally, Hyderabad having inherited from her husband late K. Yadaiah. It is stated that originally one J. Venkata Rao purchased the said property through registered sale deed bearing document No.194 of 1945 from one Charlapali Brahmaiah and said Venkat Rao in his turn sold the same in favour of her mother-in-law by name K. Yellamma through a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top