SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 647

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Shamshuddin – Appellant
Versus
Atta Anaruddin – Respondent


ORDER

Appellants filed a claim petition seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- from respondents alleging that their son-Ayub Basha (the deceased), aged 24 years earning Rs. 1600/- p.m., a van driver, died as a result of an accident, as the van being driven by him was dashed against by a lorry belonging to 151 respondent and insured with 2nd respondent, due to the rash and negligent driving of its driver.

2. 1st respondent chose to remain ex parte both in the Tribunal and in this Court.

3. 2nd respondent filed its counter putting the appellants to proof of the averments in the petition.

4. In support of their case, 1st appellant examined himself as P.W.1 and another witness as P.W.2 and marked Exs.A-1 to A-4. No evidence either oral or documentary adduced to behalf of 2nd respondent.

5. Holding that the accident occurred due to 50% negligence of the deceased and 50% negligence of the driver of the lorry, the Tribunal awarded Rs. 40,000/- as compensation to the appellants. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded to them, the claimants preferred this appeal.

6. The points for consideration:

1. Due to whose negligence did the accident occur?

2. To what compensation are the appellants entitl










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top