SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 756

V.V.S.RAO
Medipally Pentaiah – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Divisional Officer – Respondent


ORDER

The land admeasuring Acs.16.92 cents of Elimenedu Village in Ranga Reddy District was owned by one Smt. Mankhala Radhamma. She filed a declaration being C.C.No.l/3508/75 under A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on b Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (the Act, for 1 brevity). As she was determined to be surplus C holder, land admeasuring Acs.16.92 in survey No.307 was taken possession by the Government, as per the orders of the Land Reforms Tribunal, Hyderabad East Division. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Ibrahimpatnam (MRO), assigned the said land to the petitioners by proceedings dated 18-06-1979. Petitioners 1 to 6 were assigned an extent of Acs.2.00 each whereas seventh petitioner was assigned an extent of AcsA.92 cents. The petitioners allege that they have taken possession of the land and cultivated the land for about fifteen (15) years. The Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Rangareddy East Division, however, issued proceedings dated 26-10-1996 cancelling the assignment made in favour of the petitioners and directed to restore the land to the declarant Radhamma. This writ petition is filed seeking invalidation of the proceedings of the RDO, the first respondent herein.

2. A counter af













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top