SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1099

V.V.S.RAO
Dammalapati Ramalingam – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Khammam District – Respondent


ORDER

The three petitioners purchased the land from M/s. V.T.K. Prabhakar and fifteen others under registered sale deeds in 1996. The petitioners allege that their vendors or their predecessors in title had been enjoying the land with all their rights since long. However, it appears, the second respondent made attempts to resume the land on the ground that the original assignees in whose favour the land was allegedly assigned relinquished their rights. Therefore, the present Writ Petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in resuming the land in Survey Nos.21 and 30 situated at Raghunathapalem Village of Khamman (Urban) Mandal in Khammam District, as arbitrary and illegal. They also sought a consequential direction to the respondents not to reassign the resumed land.

2. This Court while adjourning the matter for instructions by the Government Pleader on 02-11-2004 passed orders directing the respondents not to distribute the land to the third parties. Subsequently, the matter was admitted on 10-11-2004 and the interim order was directed to be continued until further orders. The respondents have now come forward with W.V.M.P.No.755 of 2005 see




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top