SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1119

G.ROHINI
B. Vandana Kumari – Appellant
Versus
P. Praveen Kumar – Respondent


ORDER

This Revision Petition is preferred against the order dated 7-9-2004 in I.A. No.671 of 2004 in O.P.No.720 of 2002 under which the learned Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, directed the revision petitioner to subject herself to DNA test along with her daughter at Centre for D. NA, Finger Print and Diagnostics, E.C.I.L. Road, Nizamabad.

2. The facts, in brief, are as under:

The marriage between the revision petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the wife) and the first respondent (hereinafter referred to as the husband) was performed on 23-5-2002 as per Hindu rites and customs at Nizamabad. On 16-9-2002, the husband filed O.P.No.720 of 2002 in the Family Court, Hyderabad, under Section 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the Act) to declare the marriage as null and void on the ground that the wife was pregnant by some other person at the time of the marriage. It is alleged that their marriage was not consummated at all and on 31-5-2002 when he along with his wife went to visit a temple, the wife hoodwinked him and fled away with the second respondent herein, who is no other than her own brother-in-law. Thereafter he came to know that the wife was having illicit intim











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top