Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. This civil revision petition is directed against the order and decree, dated 26-9-2006, passed by the I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District in allowing the application I.A.No. 1449 of 2004 in O.S.No.689 of 2000 from the date of order itself.

3. The petitioner is the plaintiff, respondent No.1 is defendant No.1 and respondent No.2 is proposed defendant No.2 in the suit before the Court below.

4. For the sake of convenience, in this order, the parties herein are referred to as per their array in the suit.

5. The suit is filed for mandatory injunction for removing the basement verified in ABFE red marked portion of the plaint plan and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from constructing the wall. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiff, for some reason, probably from the information furnished in the affidavit filed in support of the application, felt that it is expedient to add the proposed party as defendant No.2 to the suit. In this regard, the present application under Order I, Rule 10 and Order VI, Rule 17 and Section 151 C.P.C., had been filed by the plaintiff on 29-5-20