SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 74

G.S.SINGHVI, C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
South Central Railway, rep. by its General Manager, Secunderabad – Appellant
Versus
Mutha Navin Krishna – Respondent


JUDGMENT

(Per G.S. Singhvi, C.J.)

This appeal is directed against order dated 9-11-2006 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby she allowed the writ petition filed by the respondents and quashed order dated 31-3-2006 passed by Estate Officer and Additional Divisional Railway Manager, South Central Railway, Vijayawada (hereinafter referred to as the Estate Officer) under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (for short, the 1971 Act).

2. A perusal of the record shows that by claiming themselves to be the owners of land comprised in Town Survey No.1961/1, Ward No.2, Block No.42 of Kakinada Town, the respondents filed Writ Petition No.1309 of 2006 against their threatened dispossession. The same was disposed of by this Court on 27 -1-2006 with the direction that the non petitioners (the appellants herein) shall not interfere or dispossess the petitioners (the respondents herein) from the land comprised in Town Survey No.1961/1 of Kakinada Town and Municipal Corporation without following the due process of law. Thereafter, the Estate Officer issued notices dated 16-2-2009 to the respondents under Section 4(1) of the 1971 Act requiring them to vacate the l



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top