L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Chand Bee (Died) by L. R. – Appellant
Versus
Hameedunnissa – Respondent
These two second appeals arise out of common judgment and separate decrees rendered in A.S.Nos.10 and 11 of 1990 on the file of the IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad, dated 15-10-2005, through which, the common judgment, rendered by the Court of VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.S.Nos.100 and 2481 of 1984, and the corresponding decrees dated 19-12-1989; were reversed.
.
2. The defendants in O.S.No.100 of 1984 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.2481 of 1984 and the sale plaintiff in O.S.No.100 of 1984 is the defendant in O.S.No.2481 of 1984. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in O.S.No.100 of 1984.
3. One Smt. Khaja Bee, wife of Mohd. Abdullah, purchased an extent of 665 sq. yards from one Smt. Danam Rangamma, through a sale deed dated 16-2-1952. Out of this, she is said to have alienated two small pieces, admeasuring 100 sq. yards and 122 sq. yards, to different persons, and retained 443 sq. yards. A house was constructed in the year 1964, over this land. Khaja Bee and her husband Abdullah had two sons by name, Rahamatullah and Shaik Ahmed and three daughters by name. Chand Bee, Khasim Bee (
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.