SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1283

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Chand Bee (Died) by L. R. – Appellant
Versus
Hameedunnissa – Respondent


JUDGMENT

These two second appeals arise out of common judgment and separate decrees rendered in A.S.Nos.10 and 11 of 1990 on the file of the IX Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court (Fast Track Court), Hyderabad, dated 15-10-2005, through which, the common judgment, rendered by the Court of VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in O.S.Nos.100 and 2481 of 1984, and the corresponding decrees dated 19-12-1989; were reversed.

.

2. The defendants in O.S.No.100 of 1984 are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.2481 of 1984 and the sale plaintiff in O.S.No.100 of 1984 is the defendant in O.S.No.2481 of 1984. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in O.S.No.100 of 1984.

3. One Smt. Khaja Bee, wife of Mohd. Abdullah, purchased an extent of 665 sq. yards from one Smt. Danam Rangamma, through a sale deed dated 16-2-1952. Out of this, she is said to have alienated two small pieces, admeasuring 100 sq. yards and 122 sq. yards, to different persons, and retained 443 sq. yards. A house was constructed in the year 1964, over this land. Khaja Bee and her husband Abdullah had two sons by name, Rahamatullah and Shaik Ahmed and three daughters by name. Chand Bee, Khasim Bee (
































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top