V.ESWARAIAH
Mummidi Raghavendra Rao – Appellant
Versus
Malladi Gollamma – Respondent
Appellants are the plaintiffs; and the respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.130 of 1990 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Kakinada, filed for declaration of plaintiffs title to the plaint schedule property;
for possession of the same after evicting the 1st defendant therefrom; and for recovery of Rs.23,490/- towards past profits for the years, 1986-87, 1987-88 and 1988-89; for future profits; and for costs, and the same was dismissed by judgment and decree, dated 31-10-1996, with an observation that the plaintiffs are at liberty to receive the balance sale consideration due under EX.B-1agreement of sale subject to their executing the sale deed in performance of the said agreement of sale. Aggrieved thereby, the present Appeal Suit has been filed by the plaintiffs.
2. Parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.
3. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 and the 2nd defendant are the sons; plaintiffs 5, 6 and 3rd defendant are the daughters; and the 4th plaintiff is the wife of late Veera Raghavulu. 1st defendant is the holder of Ex.B-1-agreement executed by late Veeraraghavulu and the plaintiffs 1 and 3; and the 41h defendant is the sister of the 4th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.