SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1471

V.ESWARAIAH
Mummidi Raghavendra Rao – Appellant
Versus
Malladi Gollamma – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Appellants are the plaintiffs; and the respondents are the defendants in O.S.No.130 of 1990 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Kakinada, filed for declaration of plaintiffs title to the plaint schedule property;

for possession of the same after evicting the 1st defendant therefrom; and for recovery of Rs.23,490/- towards past profits for the years, 1986-87, 1987-88 and 1988-89; for future profits; and for costs, and the same was dismissed by judgment and decree, dated 31-10-1996, with an observation that the plaintiffs are at liberty to receive the balance sale consideration due under EX.B-1agreement of sale subject to their executing the sale deed in performance of the said agreement of sale. Aggrieved thereby, the present Appeal Suit has been filed by the plaintiffs.

2. Parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.

3. Plaintiffs 1 to 3 and the 2nd defendant are the sons; plaintiffs 5, 6 and 3rd defendant are the daughters; and the 4th plaintiff is the wife of late Veera Raghavulu. 1st defendant is the holder of Ex.B-1-agreement executed by late Veeraraghavulu and the plaintiffs 1 and 3; and the 41h defendant is the sister of the 4th


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top