First respondent obtained a money decree against the revision petitioner and respondents 2 to 4 and filed E. P. for attachment of the salary of the revision petitioner. Revision petitioner filed his counter contending that he filed a petition to set aside the ex parte decree with a petition to condone delay, and so the E.P. has to be stayed until orders are passed in the petition filed by him under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Rejecting the contention of the revision petitioner the executing Court posted the E. P. for further steps. Hence this revision.

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that in view of Rule 26 of Order 21 CPC revision petitioner is entitled to seek stay of execution proceedings till he obtains orders in the petition filed under Rule 13 of Order 9 CPC. Rule 26 of Order 21 CPC relates to the power of the Court to which the decree has been sent for execution staying the execution for a reasonable time to enable the judgment debtor to apply to the Court by which the decree was passed, or to any court having appellate jurisdiction in respect of the decree or execution thereof for an order to stay execution. Section 39 CPC