SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1268

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
D. Sajeeva Rao – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Sadiq – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Appellants, who are the husband and children of Shali Bai (deceased), filed a clam petition under the provisions of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- alleging that when the deceased was proceeding as a pillion rider on a TVS Champ Moped- being driven by one D. Renuka, the lorry belonging to the second respondent and insured with the third respondent being driven by the first respondent in a rash and negligent manner dashed the said TVS. Champ from behind, resulting in the death of the deceased who was earning Rs. 5,000/- p.m. from all sources.

2. First respondent chose to remain ex parte.

3. Second respondent filed his counter denying the rash and negligent driving on the part of his driver and alleging that the accident occurred due to sudden crossing of the road by the driver of the TVS Champ and alleging contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the TVS Champ.

4. Third respondent filed its counter putting the appellants proof of the averments in the petition.

5. In support of their claim, appellants examined the first appellant as P.W.1 and two other witnesses as P.Ws.2 and 3 and marked Exs.A-1 to A-9. No evidence either oral and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top