SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1446

T.MEENA KUMARI, P.LAKSHMANA REDDY
Abdul Sayeed – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

(per the Hon’ble Mrs.Justice

T. Meena Kumari)

The present appeal is preferred by the appellant accused aggrieved by the conviction and the sentence imposed by the learned II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, in Sesions Case No.307 of 2003 on 14.09.2004 for the offence punishable under 302 IPC.

2. The facts in brief are as follows:

3. One Nafees Begum (for short, the deceased) is no other than the wife of the accused. Their marriage took place about 20 years back and they were residing at Noorishah colony, Bandlaguda along with her children.

4. While so, on 6.6.2001 the elder son of the deceased came to the are house of P.W.1, who is no other than the brother of the deceased and informed about the death of the deceased due to heart attack. Then, P.W.1 rushed there and found the deceased lying dead on the floor. On observation, he found nail marks and scar marks over the neck of the deceased. Having suspected the accused, P.W.1 lodged a complaint and the same was registered as a case in crime No.130 of 2001 under Section 174 Cr.P.C., initially and investigated into.

5. During the course of investigation, inquest as well as post mortem examination was












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top