SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 154

BILAL NAZKI
Major P. T. Choudary – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Abdul Basheer Khan – Respondent


O R D E R

The first petitioner is the wife of the second petitioner. By the year 1999, they had two daughters and one son. The first petitioner has undergone Tubectomy operation at Government Primary Health Center, Thorruru, on 27.02.1999. Petitioners 1 and 2 have begotten the third petitioner herein on 17.01.2001, despite the operation. It is stated that the family of petitioners 1 and 2 is very poor and on account of the birth of the third petitioner, they are overburdened, apart from undergoing physical and mental agony. They filed this writ petition with a prayer to award a sum of Rs..9,00,000/-, as compensation under various heads, against the respondents.

2. On behalf of the respondents, a common counter-affidavit is filed. It is stated that as a part of the family planning drive, several Tubectomy and Vasectomy operations were conducted at the fourth respondent primary health center on 27.02.1999 by well-trained Medical Officers, assisted by trained Para Medical Staff. It is stated that several hundreds of operations were conducted earlier thereto in that center and there was no instance of any failure. Reference is also made to the declaration submitted by petitioners 1 and 2











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top