SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 363

V.V.S.RAO
Tirumala Modern – Appellant
Versus
Transmision Corpn. , of A. P. , Ltd. – Respondent


C O M M O N O R D E R

This common order shall dispose of these three writ petitions as question raised and the background of the cases is similar. The respondents in these three writ petitions are also the same.

2. The petitioner in W.P.No.22023 of 2006 is availing electricity supply from the respondents under L.T.Category-III service connection bearing No.7335. The second respondent inspected the petitioner’s premises on 28.09.2006 and found that CT meters and CT chamber seal bit No.A40033 to be in tampered condition. On opening the CT box, it was observed that R-phase CT secondary terminal SI connection is loose and R-phase potential connection at tapping point is loose. There were also other incriminating circumstances. The second respondent came to prima facie conclusion that the petitioner resorted to pilferage of energy. A case under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 (Electricity Act, for brevity) was registered and power connection was disconnected. Provisional value of electricity pilfered was assessed at Rs.5,64,429/- including electricity duty and supervision charges and the petitioner was asked to approach the Assistant Accounts Officer, Electricity Revenue Off























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top