SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 128

P.S.NARAYANA
K. Mallesh Mudiraj – Appellant
Versus
C. Sudhakar – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Heard Sri K.Maheswara Rao, counsel representing appellant and Sri K.Mohan, counsel representing the respondent.

2. The plaintiff filed O.S.No.229 of 2006 on the file of the Court of III-Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, for refund of advance amount said to be due under an agreement of sale as against the appellant herein, who is the defendant in the said suit and he also moved an application in I.A.No.673 of 2006 in O.S.No.229 of 2006 on the file of III-Additional Senior Civil Judge, Secunderabad, under Order-38, Rule 5 and 6 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, (hereinafter referred to as Code for the purpose of convenience) praying for a direction to furnish security of Rs.7,50,000/for the value of the suit, failing which to attach Flat No.508 and 307 in survey no.106 situated at Balreddynagar, Chintal Balanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy district. The said application was resisted by the appellant that the learned Judge recorded certain reasons and ultimately allowed the said application ordering attachment of the property in question before judgment. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.

3. Sr














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top