SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1460

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Petla Suryanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Singampalli Appalanaidu – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The unsuccessful plaintiff in O.S.No.15 of 1996, on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Narsipatnam, filed the Second Appeal. He filed the suit for the relief of perpetual injunction, against the respondents, in respect of the suit schedule property. He pleaded that he entered into an agreement of sale, with the 1st respondent, on 27-3-1983, for purchase of the suit schedule property, for a consideration of Rs.15,000/- and he paid a sum of Rs.5,100/- on the date of agreement. A further sum of Rs.8,000/- is said to have been paid on 20-4-1983 and Rs.1,000/- in June 1983. According to him, the possession of the property was delivered on the date of agreement itself. The 1st respondent was said to be under obligation, to arrange for execution of sale deed, with the participation of the original owners, by name Macherla Seetharatnam of Kakinada and Kadimisetti Saraswathi of Anakapalli. He alleged that notwithstanding his possession and enjoyment over the property since 1983, the respondents who belong to the same family, attempted to dispossess him on 23-1-1996. With these averments he filed the suit.

2. The 1st respondent filed written statement. He stated that he i




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top