The plaintiff in O.S.No.343 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge. City Civil court. Hyderabad filed this Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the order dated 4.2.2000 in I.A.No.3653 of 1998 appointing Court guardian to represent the 6th defendant in the suit.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:

The revision petitioner filed O.S.No-343 of 1998 seeking a decree for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property. The defendant No.l in the suit. who is the 1st respondent herein, is the mother of the plaintiff and the defendant No.6 is the younger brother of the plaintiff. Pending the suit the defendants filed I.A No.3653 of 1998 under Order 32. Rule 3 of CPC seeking to appoint the first defendant as guardian for the 6th defendant. The Ist defendant- mother sworn to the affidavit stating that the defendant No.6 is insane and that though the plaintiff is fully aware of the said fact. he failed to take any steps for appointment of guardian for the 6th defendant. She also stated that the defendant No.6 is in her care and custody and that she has no adverse interest against the 6th defendant and accordingly sought to appoint her