SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 850

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
G. Nirmala – Appellant
Versus
Syed Zahir Ahmed – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

This criminal appeal is preferred by the complainant against the judgment dated 20-02-2001 passed in C.C.No.702 of 1999 by the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, wherein the first respondentaccused was acquitted of the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, ‘the Act’).

2. The appellant is the complainant and the first respondent is the accused. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they were arrayed in the trial Court.

3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the accused approached the complainant in the month of May, 1998 for a hand loan of Rs.1,20,000/- to meet his domestic needs. The complainant accordingly gave an amount of Rs.1,20,000/- to the accused and at that time the accused promised that he would repay the said amount within a period of six months, but he failed to do so. Despite the fact that the complainant requested and demanded for repayment of the loan amount, the accused was postponing the same on some pretext or the other and ultimately issued Ex.P1, cheque bearing No.615589 dated 05-08-1999, for the said amount. After consultation and with the consent of the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top