SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1204

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Lakkaraju Radha Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Pyarle Sri Rama Sarma – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Respondents 1 and 2 filed O.S.No.34 of 2003 in the Court of III Additional District Judge, Guntur, against respondents 3 to 5 and the petitioner herein, for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 05-05-2003 in respect of the land in R.S.Nos.971 /1 and 971/2 of Vengalanagar, Bapatla. The petitioner herein, figured as defendant No.4 in the suit. The trial of the suit is in progress. On behalf of the petitioner, a document dated 05-05-2003 was sought to be relied upon. Initially, it was received evidence, as Ex.B-8, subject to the objection raised by the respondents 1 and 2 (for short ‘the respondents’, since is endorsed that the other respondents are not necessary). Respondents filed a revision before this Court against the said endorsement. The revision was allowed and the question, relating to the admissibility of the document, was directed to be decided, before the document was received in evidence. It was in this context, that the petitioner on the one hand, and the respondents, on the other hand, have put forward their contentions, on the admissibility of the document. Through a reasoned order, dated 23-01-2006, the trial Court held th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top