The respondent filed O.S.No.444 of 1997 in the court of III Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, against the petitioner, for recovery of certain amount. The trial itself commenced at a belated stage. The cross-examination of petitioner, as DW.1 is said to have taken place in the month of August, 2006.

2. The petitioner filed I.A.No.1902 of 2006 in the suit under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC, to recall him for re-examination. He stated that he has answered several questions in the cross-examination in Hindi and in the course of translation, some inaccuracy has crept in. It is also stated that the discrepancy, in what is stated by the petitioner and what was translated, was noticed only after the certified copy of the deposition was obtained. The application was resisted by the respondent and ultimately, the trial court dismissed the IA, through its order, dated 18-10-2006. The same is challenged in this Civil Revision Petition.

3. Sri Javed Razack, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the necessity for the petitioner to file the instant application arose on account of the fact that some of the sentences in the deposition of the p