SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(AP) 521

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : K.RAMASWAMY
Kundanmal Ramral, Hyd.rep.by its partner, Bhagirath Pewar - Appellant
Versus
Ex.Officio Secretary, F&A Dept., Govt.of A P.Hyd. - Respondent
W.P. No. 333/1986
Decided On : 12-01-88
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. Shaik Sardar

Headnote:ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, Section 6-A - A.P. SCHEDULED COMMODITIES (L&D) ORDER, 1982, Rule 4 14) - Application filed for renewal of licence - Licencee is entitled to continue business till the renewal is granted or rejected. Inspecting authority found discrepancy in the stocks on account of omission to make entries in the records - Seized stocks confiscated - Dealer is entitled to make entries in the records at the close of the day - Confiscation order is quashed.

       

Kundanmal Ramral, Hyd. rep. by its partner, Bhagirath Pewar vs Ex. Officio Secretary, F&A Dept. , Govt. of A P. Hyd. - 1988 Supreme(AP) 521
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top