SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(AP) 206

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : RAMANUJAM, SETHURAMAL
D.C. (Bh) Ltd. Mad - Appellant
Versus
Kamala Pillai - Respondent
A.A.O.No.66/1978
Decided On : 09-01-81
.

Headnote:C P C Or21, R63 & Or38, R8 - Attachment of property before Judgment - Claim petition dismissed for default - Sale of attachment property and execution Petition filed Second claim petition filed before executing Court - 2nd claim petition was not maintainable

       Held: Since OR8 C P C, directs that adjudication of claims to property attached before judgment should be done in the same manner as an adjudication against claim against attachment of the property in execution of a decree O21, Rs 58 and 6 Civil PC will automatically apply to the claims made against an order of attachl1ent before judgment

D. C. (Bh) Ltd. Mad vs Kamala Pillai - 1981 Supreme(AP) 206
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top