Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : RAMASWAMY
Krishna Pratap Rao - Appellant
Versus
Madgi Pochaiah - Respondent
C.R.P. 1513/82
Decided On : 12-08-82
Advocates Appeared :
Mr. S. Venkateswara Rao,Mr. A. Suryanarayana Murthy
Held: The proper valuation of the plaint is to be based on the value of the total number of trees in respect of which injunction is sought for, and Court-fee has to be paid thereon The Gulmohra trees are only timber fit for being used as building material The definition of Immoveable property excludes standing timber, therefore, it is not an immoveable property, then Sec 26(a) of the Andhra Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, has no application to the facts of the case The plaintiffs by virtue of an Injunction that is sought for are entitled to get advantage of retention of the trees standing on their patta lands If that be the advantage, then they have to value the trees standing on their patta lands and determine the valuation of the suit and pay Court-fee thereon under sec 26(c) of the Act,
GRP Allowed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.