G.ROHINI
Canara Bank, Secunderabad – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. , New Delhi – Respondent
2. During the pendency of the above proceedings, the 1st respondent-Power Grid Corporation of India Limited had invoked the bank guarantee dated 24.2.1997 furnished by the petitioner-Bank on behalf of the 4th respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner-Bank paid the entire amount covered by the bank guarantee i.e., Rs.2,44,50,362/- to the 1st respondent Corporation. The petitioner claims that the said amount is also due from the 4th respondent.
3. While so, the 4th respondent Company became a sick unit and on a reference made to the Board for Industrial Finance and Reconstruction (BIFR), a case was registered with the BIFR vide Case No.374/2000. Pursuant thereto, by operation of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.