SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1422

G.ROHINI
Canara Bank, Secunderabad – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. , New Delhi – Respondent


ORDER :- Canara Bank, R.P. Road, Secunderabad, is the writ petitioner. In the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, it is stated that the 4th respondent herein having availed certain credit facilities from the petitioner-Bank committed default in discharging the same. Consequently, the petitioner-Bank filed O.A. No.404 of 2000 in the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Hyderabad, for recovery of amount due from the 4th respondent, which is pending.

2. During the pendency of the above proceedings, the 1st respondent-Power Grid Corporation of India Limited had invoked the bank guarantee dated 24.2.1997 furnished by the petitioner-Bank on behalf of the 4th respondent. Accordingly, the petitioner-Bank paid the entire amount covered by the bank guarantee i.e., Rs.2,44,50,362/- to the 1st respondent Corporation. The petitioner claims that the said amount is also due from the 4th respondent.

3. While so, the 4th respondent Company became a sick unit and on a reference made to the Board for Industrial Finance and Reconstruction (BIFR), a case was registered with the BIFR vide Case No.374/2000. Pursuant thereto, by operation of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions)







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top