SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1109

V.V.S.RAO
Velupadas Veeraswamy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


ORDER :- The petitioner herein assails the order of the second respondent, namely, the District Revenue Officer (DRO), dated 16.6.2006. In exercise of powers under Section 166-B of A.P. (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (the Revenue Act, for brevity), the second respondent directed the third respondent to rectify the entries in Pahanis for the year 1986-1987 and restore the same in favour of respondents 4 and 5. By impugned order, the second respondent also advised respondents 4 and 5 to approach Competent Authority for cancellation of Pattadar Pass Books (PPBs) and title deeds issued to the petitioner.

2. The brief fact of the matter is as follows: The petitioner herein is resident of Khajipet, Warangal District. He purchased land admeasuring Acs.1.36 guntas in Survey Nos.331 and 332 (old Survey Nos.154 and 156) of Khajipet Village under registered sale deed, dated 25.9.1978 from G. Lakshma Reddy and Dayananda Reddy, sons of Narasimha Reddy. Respondents 4 and 5 are daughters of the said Narasimha Reddy. The petitioner also obtained PPBs and title deeds from the third respondent under A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (the ROR Act, for brevity) and al
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top