GODA RAGHURAM
Vaka Venkata Krishna Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Ramalingeswara Swamy Devasthanam – Respondent
2. The petitioners claim to have been in possession of these lands, to be cultivating it by raising crops and paying annual Maktha regularly to the Devasthanam, for the past 30 years. The petitioners do not plead, establish or demonstrate that they are the lawful cultivating tenants of the 1st respondent-Devasthanams lands, consequent on duly executed lease deeds. No particulars are furnished in the writ petition to justify an assumption that the petitioners are lawful tenants.
3. Rule 7 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Lease of Agricultural Lands Rules, 2003 (for short the Rules) and provisions of similar rules earlier to these; whether made under the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966 or under the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987 (fo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.