L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Pedda Jagannadha Rao – Appellant
Versus
Renanki Janikamma – Respondent
2. The respondent filed O.S. No.10 of 1986 in the Court of District Munsif, Tekkali, initially, for the relief of perpetual injunction, in respect of two items of schedule property. Subsequently, the suit was amended by incorporating the relief of recovery of possession of the said items.
She pleaded that the properties were acquired by her mother and thereafter gifted to her, under a gift deed, dated 20-6-1970. She is said to have entrusted the properties to the 1st appellant, for management and taking advantage of the same, the latter stated asserting his own independent rights vis-a-vis the property.
3. On behalf of the appellants, a written statement was filed. They admitted that a gift deed (Ex.A.1), dated 20-6-1970, was executed by the mother of the 1st appellant and the respondent. However, it was pleaded that the sad gift deed was cancelled through another deed, dated 18-1-1978 (Ex.B.1), and that on the same day, their mother gifted the suit schedule property in favour of the 2nd appellant under Ex.B.2.
4. In short, these were the contentions before the trial Court. The suit was d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.