SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 4

N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA
Mohd. Shamim – Appellant
Versus
Nahid Begum and Anr. – Respondent


Judgment

S.B. Singh, J.—Leave granted.

2. The First Appellant and the First Respondent were married as per the rites governing the marriage under the Muslim Personal Law on 02.04.1989. The Appellant No. 2 is the mother of the First Appellant and the ­Appellant Nos. 3 to 5 are the sisters. The First Appellant allegedly divorced the First Respondent and intimation thereabout was communicated to her through a legal notice dated 03.05.2002. On or about 30.10.2002, the Respondent No.1 lodged a First Information Report in Women Cell, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi, against the Appellants herein which was registered as FIR No. 224 of 2002, Police Station Hauz Qasi, Delhi, under Sections 406/498-A/34 IPC. The Appellants having come to learn about the lodging of the First Information Report filed an application for grant of anticipatory bail. During the course of hearing of the said application, a settlement was arrived at inter alia at the instance of the learned judge hearing the said matter between the parties on or about 11.11.2002 pursuant whereto or in furtherance whereof the parties entered into a written agreement on 14.11.2002.

3. By reason of an order dated 11.11.2002, the learned Additio






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top