SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 617

SURYA KANT
Bachna Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Surya Kant, J.—This revision petition has been directed against the judgment dated August 29, 1986 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra, whereby the petitioner was held guilty of the committing offences under Sections 302-A, 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years along with a fine of Rs. 500/- for an offence under Section 304-A IPC, RI for three months for an offence under Section 279 IPC, RI for four months for an offence under Section 337 IPC and RI for nine months under Section 318 IPC and in default of payment of fine, further RI for two months, though all the substantive sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently, as well as against the judgment dated November 9, 1987, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kurukshetra, whereby the petitioner’s appeal against the aforesaid judgment dated August 29, 1986 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kurukshetra, was dismissed.

2. The petitioner was a driver of the Haryana Roadway and was driving the bus bearing registration No. HYA-2270 on the fateful day which was proceeding from Kalka to Hodel. There were about










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top