SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(AP) 1578

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
THANNERU VENKATAIAH – Appellant
Versus
VADLAMUDI KASAIAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.R.S.Srinivas, M.V.S.Suresh Kumar, S.LAKSHMINARAYAN REDDY

( 1 ) THE respondents 1 to 7 filed. P. No. 6 of 1990, in the Court of Subordinate Judge, markapur, to declare one Sri Thanneeru musalaiah, the respondent No. 24 herein, as insolvent. They have also impleaded three others, by name T. Venkataiah, t. Narayanamma and T. Guramma, inasmuch as the respondent No. 24 transferred certain items of property in their favour. It was pleaded in the. P. that respondent No. 24 had contracted debts with the petitioners in the. P. , but failed to discharge the same. According to them, the transfers were made, only to screen the debts.

( 2 ) THE matter was contested by all the respondents in the. P. The appellants herein are the legal representatives of respondents 2 and 3 in the. P. On their behalf, an Advocate was engaged, and he reported no instructions. The trial court decreed the. P. , through its order dated 25-3-1995. Aggrieved thereby, the appellants filed A. S. No. 112 of 1995, in the Court of II Additional District Judge, ongole. The appeal was dismissed on 22-6-2006. Hence, this CMSA.

( 3 ) SRI S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that his clients were set ex parte, only on the ground that their counsel re









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top