SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 422

V.V.S.RAO
J. JAYALALITHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: I.V.RADHAKRISHNA MURTHY, L.Nageswar Rao

( 1 ) M/s. NATYA Kala Niketan, a partnership firm, at 8/1 Siva Gnanam Road, T. Nagar, madras - 17, had purchased an extent of ac. 3. 20 gts in survey No. 93/voo and an extent of Acs. 1. 15 gts in survey No. 93/ru situated at Pet Basheerabad village of Medchal mandal in Ranga Reddy District under a registered sale deed dated 07-6-1968 from m/s. Cherukuru Suryanarayana Raju, Radha krishna Raju, Venkata Vijaya Rama Raju and Venkata Ravi Prasada Raju. Under the same sale deed, the said firm purchased another extent of Acs. 4. 00 in survey No. 52/a situated at Jeedimetla village. The said firm also purchased an extent of Acs. 3. 15 gts in survey No. 93/ee situated at Pet Basheerabad village under registered sale deed from m/s. Kummari Durgaiah and Kummari Balaiah. Be it noted that the petitioner and her mother were the two partners of M/s. Natya Kala niketan. After expiry of her mother on 02-11-1971, by necessary mutation proceedings, petitioner was recorded in the revenue accounts as owner. Petitioner alleges that before the sale was effected in favour of the firm, permission under sections 47 and 48 of Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act, 1950 (the Tenan























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top