( 1 ) HEARD Sri N. Siva Reddy, the Counsel representing appellant and Sri Sreeramulu Reddy, the Counsel representing respondent.

( 2 ) THIS Court on 21-5-1996 made the following order :-

"admit in view of substantial questions of law especially the one relating to limitation. "

( 3 ) SRI Siva Reddy, the learned Counsel representing appellant would submit that the only substantial question of law which would arise for consideration is "whether the courts below had arrived at correct conclusion on the question of limitation in the facts and circumstances of the case?" The learned Counsel pointed out to the respective pleadings of the parties, the evidence available on record and also the findings recorded by the Court of the first instance and also the appellate Court and would contend that if the period from the date of the appellate order - Ex. A. 11 to be reckoned with, the same is beyond the period of limitation.

( 4 ) ON the contrary, the learned Counsel representing respondent would contend that inasmuch as some further time had been specified under Ex. A. ll, the period to be reckoned with after thirty days, after the making of the order- Ex. A. 11 and hence, the same is with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document