SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 826

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
METTU KHASIM REDDY – Appellant
Versus
METTU JAGANNADHA REDDY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.V.SITARAM MURTHY, Naresh Byrapaneni

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed to initiate prosecution against the revision petitioners in CRP no. 6515 of 2006 for making false statement and giving false information on oath to Court.

( 2 ) THE averments, in brief in the affidavit filed in support of the application are

(a) the petitioner and his mother, Mettu Anjamma, filed the suit against the revision petitioners i. e. , respondents 1 and 2 and five others for partition of the plaint schedule property and sought an injunction in respect of the plaint schedule property, which was granted by the trial Court. On 22-12-2006, the respondents 1 and 2, by moving a lunch motion, filed CRP no. 6515 of 2006 in this Court alleging that they are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the trial Court in delaying the disposal of ia No. 1382 of 2006 filed by them seeking an injunction against him. In the said CRP, they filed CMP No. 8922 of 2006 seeking an injunction against him and the other defendants alleging that though they filed the aforesaid IA No. 1382 of 2006 on 4th/5th december, 2006 expressing urgency, the trial court was going on adjourning the petition and did not issue injunction, and so they sought an ex parte interim injunct






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top