L.NARASIMHA REDDY
V. V. N. M. RAJU – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF A. P. , REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT – Respondent
( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent issued memo dated 22. 6. 2005 to the District Registrar, visakhapatnam-the 4th respondent, directing that the land in Sy. Nos. 120, 121/1 to 10, 128/1 to 3 of Vedulanarva Village, admeasuring Ac. 15. 55, cents shall be treated as prohibited properties (Government lands)so as to prevent further registrations. The petitioner challenges the said memo.
( 3 ) THE petitioner contends that his vendor was assigned iand in Sy. No. 121/3 in his capacity as an ex-serviceman and in terms of G. O. Ms. No. 1117 dated 11. 11. 1993, the alienation made in his favour after 10 years from the date of assignment, is permissible and legal.
( 4 ) THE 5th respondent filed a counter affidavit, just by making a reference to the impugned memo. It is contended that as long as the memo is in force, no transactions can be entertained in respect of that land.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.