SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 804

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
V. V. N. M. RAJU – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF A. P. , REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (REGISTRATION) DEPARTMENT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.RAMABRAHMAN

( 1 ) THE petitioner purchased an extent of ac. 4. 80 cents of land in Sy. No. 121/3 of vedulanarva Village, Sabbavaram Mandal, visakhapatnam District, through a sale deed dated 8. 6. 2005 from Sri B. Venkata Ramana. The vendor of the petitioner, in turn, was assigned this land on 24. 3. 1993 in his capacity as an ex-serviceman.

( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent issued memo dated 22. 6. 2005 to the District Registrar, visakhapatnam-the 4th respondent, directing that the land in Sy. Nos. 120, 121/1 to 10, 128/1 to 3 of Vedulanarva Village, admeasuring Ac. 15. 55, cents shall be treated as prohibited properties (Government lands)so as to prevent further registrations. The petitioner challenges the said memo.

( 3 ) THE petitioner contends that his vendor was assigned iand in Sy. No. 121/3 in his capacity as an ex-serviceman and in terms of G. O. Ms. No. 1117 dated 11. 11. 1993, the alienation made in his favour after 10 years from the date of assignment, is permissible and legal.

( 4 ) THE 5th respondent filed a counter affidavit, just by making a reference to the impugned memo. It is contended that as long as the memo is in force, no transactions can be entertained in respect of that land.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top