SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 681

V.V.S.RAO
M. S. PRAKASH RAO, LATE SRI MANGAIAH – Appellant
Versus
BAKA KRISHNA, SRI V. BALAIAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.RAMA RAO, S.Bal Chand

( 1 ) THE petitioner is plaintiff in O. S. No. 669 of 1999 on the file of the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ranga Reddy District. He filed the suit for delivery of vacant possession of suit schedule property. e. , 700 Sq. yards of land forming part of Plot No. C16, IDA, Uppal, together with compound wall and gates as well as asbestos covered sheds. The suit is also for mesne profits.

( 2 ) THE petitioner purchased the suit schedule property under registered sale deed dated 18. 1. 2006 from Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) for the purpose of setting up an industry. As he could not utilize the entire extent of land, he allegedly entered into licence-cum-hire agreement dated 01. 1. 1997 with the respondents/defendants who agreed to erect structures on the demised plot, after obtaining necessary permission and sanction from appropriate authorities. As per the said agreement, the period of license/lease was ten years with an option to renew the same. In 1999, having come to know that the respondents are raising structures without necessary permission from appropriate authorities, petitioner got issued notice calling upon the respondents to vacat















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top