SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(AP) 792

C.V.RAMULU
MAJ. GEN. (RETD. ) A. V. RAO – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.Krishnam Raju, A.Rajashekar Reddy, BHASKARA RAO BANDARUPALLI

( 1 ) THIS Writ Petition is filed seeking a mandamus declaring Proceedings No. M/prov/ m/modp/mnl/1110/2000 and Order No. G1/ m/x1/1042/modp/00, dated 9-8-2000 of the 2nd respondent and letter No. 3023/ppo/2k, dated 12-8-2000 of the 6th respondent as arbitrary, illegal, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to Articles 14, 16 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to continue to pay the pension to the petitioner every month as per Corrigendum PPO no. M/modp/33028/99 issued by the 2nd respondent.

( 2 ) PETITIONER joined Indian Army as a commissioned Officer with effect from 12-6-1960 and rose in ranks to the post of major General and sought premature retirement with effect from 31-5-1991 to enable him to join as Executive Director in hindustan Cables Limited. He joined at hindustan Cables Limited with effect from 1 -6-1991. According to him, he had commuted 100% of pension at the time of his appointment in Hindustan Cables Limited. Therefore, he did not draw any pension from 1-6-1991 till 31-12-1995 i. e. while in service of Hindustan Cables Limited and subsequently also. According to the petitioner, after the V Cent
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top